Why Nicholas II Survived the Revolution of 1905 but Not that of 1917 Es

Why Nicholas II Survived the Revolution of 1905 but non that of 1917 When Father Gapon and his followers marched peacefully on the Winter Palace on 22nd January in what came to be kn hold as Bloody sunlight due to the extreme reaction leading to the massacre of the protestors, it sparked the revolution of 1905, consisting of workers strikes and protests in addition to terrorising the wealthy and important upper classes. As well as being a response to Bloody Sunday, the 1905 revolution was a resoluteness of pent up dissatisfaction with the autocracy in Russia and with the vast social inequality. However, in spite of the unrest within the country, the tsar managed to retain power later this revolution. In 1917, when the populate revolted again, he was non so lucky, and the autocracy fell. in that respect are many reasons why the Tsar was able to survive the 1905 revolution, not least of which was the benefit of good ministers to advise him well. Stol ypin tried to have a moderating influence on the Tsar and to help him make concessions to the people which would promise to improve their lives enough that the revolution would die down. However, by 1917 twain Stolypin and Witte were dead, and the Tsarina Alexandra was in charge of the running of the country due to the Tsars absence to the front to fight with the army. During the time in which he was away, Alexandra replaced many of Nicholas ministers with her own personal favourites, most of whom were poorly equipped to hold such powerful positions at such an unstable time. Due to this, the Tsar had few able-bodied ministers to advise him through the crisis when revolution broke out and help him turn out unsca... ...es stipulated therein played a large part in his gloaming in 1917. The emergence of the free press after 1905 granted the good to express opinions by publication meant that the Tsar was widely criticised to the public for the offset ti me, whereas previously none of his wrong-doings had ever been made known, and he was viewed as ordain by god. Now however the Russians began to see him as fallible and to gesture his actions, leading to further unrest. Similarly, and perhaps most importantly, the Duma in 1917 provided a feasible alternative to the autocracy which had not been present in 1905. Ironically, just as freeing the serfs had led to them wanting more and assassinating Tsar Alexander II, Nicholas grandfather, so granting the people their Duma in 1905 in part led to the eventual free fall of the Tsar in 1917.