Comparison Of 1984 By George Orwell To The Actual 1984 Essay -- Compar

Comparison Of 1984 By George Orwell To The Actual 1984 Since the onset of the United States, Americans own alship canal viewed the future in two sorts whiz, as the perfect society with a perfect brass, or two, as a communistic hell where free will no longer exists and no one is happy. The novel 1984 by George Orwell is a combination of both theories. On the big(p) side, a communist state exists which is enforced with surveillance technology and hard-core patriots. On the good side, however, everyone in the society who was born after the remote takeover, which converted the once democratic government into a communist government, isnt untamed about their life, nor do they wish to change any aspect of their life. For the hardly a(prenominal) infidels who exist, it is a maddening existence, of constant work and brainwashing. George Orwells novel was definitely unalike from the actual 1984, but how different were they? They were different in 3 ways government, society, and tho ught.1984 starts out with a so c every(prenominal)ed traitor to the party, Winston Smith, walking through the streets nervously observing the video cameras that ar watching his every move. He makes his way into his apartment and produces a journal from his coat pocket. He thinks that even this easy act of attempting to keep track of time and history could get him vaporized. This facial expression portrays the strong grip the government has on its patrons. A person every obeys them, or is killed, or put into a forced labor camp. afterwards Winston starts an illegal affair with a younger woman he gets inattentive and the party finds out that he has committed what they call thought crimes. A thought crime is the intent to do something illegal but non actually doing it. In Winstons military man a thought crime is merely as severe as a physical crime. They arrest him and his little girl and torture them until they realize what they did was wrong and that they love the party and will never do anything to hurt it again.The two governmental systems were different in a very major way. The actual government of England in 1984 was a democracy. This democracys induction was made up of a parliament and a prime minister. most(prenominal) other nations of the time had the same set up. In Orwells novel an oligarchical state existed. Airstrip One, which is the area we call England, was home to Winston and the central government of Oceania (a large natio... ...omething without actually doing it. In Oceania a thought crime is except as bad as a physical crime.The penalty for such an offense is that you are taken to the Ministry of Love, but not killed. You are now brainwashed until you love the companionship. Obrien, an inner party member, justifies this by stating that all great nations of the past fell because they killed all pile who didnt like them. The Party will never fall because they dont create martyrs. All people they go along love the Party when they are finally killed. For example Winston is captured and brought to the Ministry of Love, he and so is brainwashed and released to society when he truly liked the Party. Once he lived in the community for a while longer he is shaft of light in the back of the head. The trains of thought, government, and society of the year 1984 versus George Orwells 1984 are clearly different. aft(prenominal) looking at the differences I stated, the reason why most people who have read the book feel sorry for Winston should be to a greater extent apparent than ever. The creation of books with story lines like 1984 help to shape our opinions of how the world should be, and make our views stronger than they have ever been.